奈良大学リポジトリ

| Home Login |

XooNIps検索
  
     詳細検索

インデックスツリー

詳細



閲覧数:850
ID AN00181569-20110300-1004
アイテムタイプ Article
このアイテムを表示する
画像
本文 AN00181569-20110300-1004.pdf
Type : application/pdf Download
Size : 3.9 MB
Last updated : Feb 27, 2013
Downloads : 450

Total downloads since Sep 24, 2012 : 450
タイトル Encountering and exploring the ultimate reality "O": A review of Bion's clinical and exploratory tools
著者
Med Hafsi (Meddo hafushi)
社会学部
publisher
出版地 奈良
出版者 奈良大学 
上位タイトル
奈良大学紀要 (Memoirs of the Nara University). Vol.39号, (2011. 03) ,p.47- 73
識別番号
ISSN
03892204
抄録 It is widely believed that Bion is one of the most influential psychoanalyst after Melanie Klein. We have inherited from him a great amount of stimulating and provocative ideas. Those ideas have now gone beyond the narrow borders of psychoanalysis and are now used even by psychologists and psychotherapists who are not affiliated with any psychoanalytic school. Some reviewers of Bion's work have suggested that Bion's legacy can be divided into theoretical and clinical concepts or tools. Although Bion's tools are widely referred to, they are still not correctly understood. Therefore,in the present article,I have tried to review those tools confining myself to the most principal ones,those which Bion regarded as indispensable for any investigation of the object of psychoanalysis,O,the ultimate truth of the session. I discuss,among others,Bion's idea of a mystic either did not go beyond a superficial reading of his works,or they have failed to understand their real meaning. Bion borrowed many concepts from not only scientific fields,but also from non-scientific fields,and used them as mere tools and models(not theories)which can be discaeded whenever they are no more useful. To those critics Bion would answered that it is not psychoanalysis he advocates that is not scientific,but it is rather science that is too narrow to deal with the object of psychoanalysis.
言語
eng
資源タイプ text
ジャンル Departmental Bulletin Paper
Index
/ Public / 奈良大学紀要 / 39号
関連アイテム